I thought it to be correct because sqrt is the opposite of multiply by a number, so ns figured by multiply by a number it would certainly balance out and also be that number normally, but when ns tried it v my Python calculator using 3 ns got:
civicpride-kusatsu.net.sqrt(3) * 3 5.196152422706632
$\begingroup$ $\sqrt x$ is the number to solve $\sqrt x \sqrt x = x$; it's no the the opposite of multiplying by $x$. $\endgroup$
In general, no. Because $\sqrt x$ is equal to $x^1/2$, your equation is the very same as $x^3/2 = x$, only $x = 0, 1$ work-related as solutions
If you want to solve because that the equation$$x\sqrtx = x$$then girlfriend have$$x (\sqrtx-1) =0 \Rightarrow x = 0, \text or \sqrtx=1, \text i.e. x = 1$$
The multiplicative train station (the "opposite" in your question) the a non-zero number $x$ is that is reciprocal, $\frac1x$. Multiply these two together provides instead $x \times \frac1x = 1$.
You are watching: What is x times the square root of x
Thanks because that contributing an answer to civicpride-kusatsu.netematics stack Exchange!Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and also share your research!
But avoid …Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.Making statements based on opinion; earlier them increase with references or personal experience.
Use civicpride-kusatsu.netJax to layout equations. Civicpride-kusatsu.netJax reference.
See more: What Kind Of Factors Are Light Temperature And Soil Composition ?
To discover more, watch our advice on writing great answers.
write-up Your answer Discard
Not the price you're spring for? Browse other questions tagged borders or ask your very own question.
calculation the the border of the sequence $a_n = \lim_n \to \infty n^\frac23\cdot ( \sqrtn-1 + \sqrtn+1 -2\sqrtn )$
site design / logo design © 2021 stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. Rev2021.9.22.40267