Does “no an ext than ten” average “ten” or “ten or less”? – Yes; or ‘only ten’.Does “no much less than ten” average “ten” or “ten or more”? – Yes; or ‘at least ten’.

You are watching: What does no less than mean


Hello Pooh,

The phrase “no much more than ten” way “ten or less”. As Mister Micawber mentioned, that can also mean “only ten”.

The phrase “no less than ten” would certainly usually mean “ten or more”.However, the expression “no less (than)” can also be supplied to present surprise, and also that could include gift surprised at what girlfriend think is an unusually big number the something. In the case, “no less than ten” might mean “exactly ten (!)” or “at least ten (!)”For example:

Sally had been worried about whether she would be able to find a job, but she received no less than ten job supplies yesterday alone! currently her biggest difficulty is do the efforts to decide which sell to accept.

“Nearly all men deserve to stand adversity, yet if you desire to check a man’s character, offer him power.” - Abraham Lincoln


Pooh June 3, 2009, 3:17pm #4

Thank you all.That’s specifically what I believed however,I’ve acquired some stupid multiple an option questions questioning me tochose only one the end of four, a,b,c,d.

Q: “I’ve head the the pay raise is no much more than 10%.”What rate is the salary raise?

a. Ten%b. Ten% or morec. Ten% or lessd. Much less than ten%

I’m not sure which I must chose, a or c…


Shyone June 3, 2009, 3:55pm #5

It’s clear ‘c’.


Pooh June 3, 2009, 4:09pm #6

But… it could also mean simply 10%, ritht?


Milanya June 3, 2009, 4:13pm #7

No. “No more than 10” means 10 or less. You can gain a 1% advanced or a 10% raise, but not 11%.


Esl_Expert June 3, 2009, 4:57pm #8

Hello Pooh,

In that context, i would select option c. (ten% or less). In various other words, i would recognize that the human being wants come say “ten percent at the most”. Possibly the speaker might even be thinking of it as “only a best of ten percent”.

I’d speak the intake of “no more than” to median “only (this specific thing)” would certainly be much more likely in a context that does no involve a an extremely specifically stated amount of something:

For example:

I was able to gain no much more than a fleeting glimpse that the chairman from mine vantage point.

I was able to obtain no an ext than a pair of fleeting glimpses of the chairman from mine vantage point.

In the 2nd version of that sentence, “a pair of” does not typical “exactly two”. It describes a small, however non-specific, number of glimpses.

“Nearly every men have the right to stand adversity, yet if you want to check a male character, give him power.” - Abraham Lincoln


Pooh June 3, 2009, 7:35pm #9

Thank you. I understand what girlfriend mean.Although ns still feel the “a” is also OK come be as a best answerbecause nobody to know the exact rate through the sentence,we only know it might be 10 or any smaller numbers than 10.

So, your are right, “c” can be the best answer if we really have actually to choose onebut still girlfriend cannot deny “a” together a exactly answer, there is constantly a possibility.

I think this kind of question is stupid and an extremely misleading.


Mister_Micawber June 3, 2009, 9:57pm #10

Actually, ns agree v you, Pooh-- the exclamation could indeed typical that the raise is just 10% (exactly), once the speaker to be expecting a larger raise. However, ns doubt the the test writer realizes that.


Pooh June 3, 2009, 10:51pm #11

I’m glad you agree v me!

Actually I almost begun come wonderif i was the only one who had such a means of thinkingsince other world seemed to be perfect OK through this kind of question.


Esl_Expert June 4, 2009, 12:37am #12
*
Pooh:

I think this kind of question is stupid and very misleading.

Unfortunately, over there are several other exercises and also test inquiries to be discovered in the civilization of ESL that room even more misleading and also dumb. Still, I need to say that I discover it very complicated to choose option (a) in this particular example – no without additional context or at least the exclamation note that MM mentioned.

One reason I discover (a) really improbable is the (limited) paper definition itself. Ns have operated in fairly a few companies, and also none that those companies ever before gave everyone exactly the exact same raise. Literally none of them.

_________________“Nearly every men deserve to stand adversity, yet if you desire to check a man’s character, give him power.” - Abraham Lincoln


Mister_Micawber June 4, 2009, 3:10am #13

Then i don’t think girlfriend have ever worked in a union shop, Esl. Across-the-board raises the a details percent room a usual topic of negotiation.


Nanucbe June 4, 2009, 4:12am #14

In many instances the test writers never ever take the test.


Esl_Expert June 4, 2009, 5:58am #15
mr Micawber:

Then ns don’t think you have ever worked in a union shop, Esl. Across-the-board raises the a details percent space a usual topic that negotiation.

True, though recently across-the-board pay cut seem come be acquiring ever more fashionable.


*
Nanucbe:

In many situations the test writers never take the test.

See more: How Many Kids Does Tim Duncan Have, Is Tim Duncan Married

Even if test-writers do take their own tests, they might still be unable to clues a particular oversight. An oversight or error may remain invisible come them till someone rather points it out.

_________________“Nearly all men have the right to stand adversity, yet if you desire to test a masculine character, offer him power.” - Abraham Lincoln


house Categories FAQ/Guidelines state of business Privacy plan

Powered by Discourse, finest viewed v JavaScript enabled